Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 2018, 54(4):190-192 | DOI: 10.17221/12/2017-CJGPB

Estimations of fibre trait stability and type of inheritance in cottonShort Communication

Vasileios GREVENIOTIS1*, Evangelia SIOKI2, Constantinos G. IPSILANDIS3
1 Department of Agricultural Technology, Technological and Educational Institute of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
2 Cotton Centre, Hellenic Agricultural Organization - DEMETER, Karditsa, Greece
3 Regional Administration of Central Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece

Traits affecting fibre quality were evaluated in a multi-location environmental experiment. Four main cotton regions in Greece were selected as different environments. Five commercial cotton cultivars were used for evaluation of 10 fibre quality traits. Each cultivar was sown in 10 different fields in each region. Environmental fluctuations within regions affected each quality trait differently showing a different degree of inheritance. Four traits showed the lowest stability index values indicating quantitative inheritance, further four traits with intermediate values indicated determination by a few genes, while the more stable and thus with qualitative inheritance traits were considered to indicate fibre maturity and uniformity. The mean estimation of stability in multi-location experiments was found the same as in multi-genotype evaluation. Two cultivars (Elsa and Celia) were found to be more stable across the Greek environments and two regions favoured stability for almost all traits. Correlations between regions were high and the same was found between genotypes.

Keywords: multi-location; genotype and environment interaction; qualitative inheritance; quantitative inheritance

Published: December 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
GREVENIOTIS V, SIOKI E, IPSILANDIS CG. Estimations of fibre trait stability and type of inheritance in cotton. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2018;54(4):190-192. doi: 10.17221/12/2017-CJGPB.
Download citation

References

  1. Bradow J.M., Davidonis G.H. (2000): Quantification of fiber quality and the cotton production-processing interface: a physiologist's perspective. Journal of Cotton Science, 4: 34-64.
  2. Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A. (1966): Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6: 36-40. Go to original source...
  3. Fasoula V.A. (2013): Prognostic breeding: A new paradigm for crop improvement. Plant Breeding Reviews, 37: 297-347. Plant Breeding. Thessaloniki, Aristoteles University of Thessaloniki. Go to original source...
  4. Green C.C., Culp T.W. (1990): Simultaneous improvements of yield, fiber quality, and yarn strength in upland cotton. Crop Science, 30: 66-69. Go to original source...
  5. Jalaluddin M., Harrison S.A. (1993): Repeatability of stability estimators for grain yield in wheat. Crop Science, 33: 720-725. Go to original source...
  6. May O.L. (1999): Genetic variation in fiber quality. In: Cotton Fibers, Developmental Biology, Quality Improvement and Textile Processing. New York, Food Products Press: 183-229. Go to original source...
  7. Meredith W.R., Jr. (2003): Thirty-six years of regional high quality variety tests. In: Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Nashville, Jan 6-10, 2003: 2561-2566.
  8. Meredith W.R., Jr., Heitholt J.J., Pettigrew W.T., Rayburn S.T., Jr. (1997): Comparison of obsolete and modern cotton cultivars at two nitrogen levels. Crop Science, 37: 1453-1457. Go to original source...
  9. Smith C.W., Braden C.A., Hequet E.F. (2010): Genetic analysis of fiber length uniformity in upland cotton. Crop Science, 50: 567-573. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.