Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 2011, 47(10):S77-S84 | DOI: 10.17221/3259-CJGPB

Understanding grain yield: it is a journey, not a destination

P.S. BAENZIGER1, I. DWEIKAT1, K. GILL2, K. ESKRIDGE1, T. BERKE3, M. SHAH4, B.T. CAMPBELL5, M.L. ALI6, N. MENGISTU1, A. MAHMOOD7, A. AUVUCHANON1, Y. YEN 8, S. RUSTGI2, B. MORENO-SEVILLA9, A. MUJEEB-KAZI10, M.R. MORRIS1
1 University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE 68583-0915 Lincoln, USA
2 Washington State University, WA 99164-6420 Pullman, USA
3 Monsanto Vegetable Seeds, 37437 State Highway 16, CA 95695 Woodland, USA
4 Biotechnology Program, Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, University Road, Tobe Camp, Abbottabad, Pakistan
5 USDA-ARS, 11 W. Lucas St., SC 29501 Florence, USA
6 University of Arkansas, Rice Research and Extension Center, 2900 Highway 130E, AR 72160 Stuttgart, USA
7 Barani Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box 35, 48800 Chakwal, Pakistan
8 South Dakota State University, SD 57007 Brookings, USA
9 Westbred, 6025 W 300 South, IN 47909 Lafayette, USA
10 National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Jhang Road, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Approximately 20 years ago, we began our efforts to understand grain yield in winter wheat using chromosome substitution lines between Cheyenne (CNN) and Wichita (WI). We found that two chromosome substitutions, 3A and 6A, greatly affected grain yield. CNN(WI3A) and CNN(WI6A) had 15 to 20% higher grain yield than CNN, whereas WI(CNN3A) and WI(CNN6A) had 15 to 20% lower grain yield than WI. The differences in grain yield are mainly expressed in higher yielding environments (e.g. eastern Nebraska) indicating genotype by environment interactions (G × E). In studies using hybrid wheat, the gene action for grain yield on these chromosomes was found to be mainly controlled by additive gene action. In subsequent studies, we developed recombinant inbred chromosome lines (RICLs) using monosomics or doubled haploids. In extensive studies we found that two regions on 3A affect grain yield in the CNN(RICLs-3A) with the positive QTLs coming from WI. In WI(RICLs-3A), we found a main region on 3A that affected grain yield with the negative QTL coming from CNN. The 3A region identified using WI(RICLs-3A) coincided with one of the regions previously identified in CNN(RICLs-3A). As expected the QTLs have their greatest effect in higher-yielding environments and also exhibit QTL × E. Using molecular markers on chromosomes 3A and 6A, the favorable alleles on 3A in Wichita may be from Turkey Red, the original hard red winter wheat in the Great Plains and presumably the original source of the favorable alleles. Cheyenne, a selection from Crimea, did not have the favorable alleles. In studying modern cultivars, many high yielding cultivars adapted to eastern Nebraska have the WI-allele indicating that it was selected for in breeding higher yielding cultivars. However, some modern cultivars adapted to western Nebraska where the QTL has less effect retain the CNN-allele, presumably because the allele has less effect (is less important in improving grain yield). In addition many modern cultivars have neither the WI-allele, nor the CNN-allele indicating we have diversified our germplasm and new alleles have been brought into the breeding program in this region.

Keywords: breeding; genetics; molecular markers; Triticum aestivum L.; wheat

Published: December 31, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BAENZIGER PS, DWEIKAT I, GILL K, ESKRIDGE K, BERKE T, SHAH M, et al.. Understanding grain yield: it is a journey, not a destination. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2011;47(Special Issue):S77-84. doi: 10.17221/3259-CJGPB.
Download citation

References

  1. Baenziger P.S., Mcmaster G.S., Wilhelm W.W., Weiss A., Hays C.J. (2004): Putting genes into genetic coefficients. Field Crops Research, 90: 133-143. Go to original source...
  2. Berke T.G., Baenziger P.S., Morris R. (1992a): Location of wheat quantitative trait loci affecting agronomic performance of seven traits using reciprocal chromosome substitutions. Crop Science, 32: 621-627. Go to original source...
  3. Berke T.G., Baenziger P S., Morris R. (1992b): Locations of wheat quantitative trait loci affecting stability of six traits using reciprocal chromosome substitutions. Crop Science, 32: 628-633. Go to original source...
  4. Bernardo R. (2008): Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Science, 48: 1649-1664. Go to original source...
  5. Bertin N., Martre P., Genard M., Quilot B., Salon C. (2010): Under what circumstances can processbased simulation models link genotype to phenotype for complex traits? Case-study of fruit and grain quality traits. Journal of Experimental Biology, 61: 955-967. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Buckler E.S., Holland J.B., Bardbury P.J., Acharya C.B., Brown P.J., Browne C., Ersoz E., Flint-Garcia S., Garcia A., Glaubitz J.C., Goodman M.M., Harjes C., Guill K., Kroon D.E., Larsson S., Lepak N.K, Li H., Mitchell S.E., Pressoir G., Peiffer J.A., Rosas M.O., Rocheford T.R., Romay M.C., Romero S., Salvo S., Villeda H.S., Da Silva H.S., Sun Q., Tian F., Upadyayula N., Ware D., Yates H., Yu J., Zhang Z., Kresovich S., McMullen M.D. (2009): The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science, 235: 714-718. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Campbell B.T., Baenziger P.S., Gill K.S., Eskridge K.M., Budak H., Erayman M., Dweikat I., Yen Y. (2003): Identification of QTLs and environmental interactions associated with agronomic traits on chromosome 3A of wheat. Crop Science, 43: 1493-1505. Go to original source...
  8. Campbell B.T., Baenziger P.S., Eskridge K.M., Budak H., Streck N.A., Weiss A., Gill K.S., Erayman M. (2004): Using environmental covariates to explain genotype × environments and QTL × environment interactions for agronomic traits on chromosome 3A of wheat. Crop Science, 44: 620-627. Go to original source...
  9. Cox T.S., Murphy J.P., Rodgers D.M. (1985): Coefficients of Parentage for 400 Winter Wheat Cultivars. Kansas State University, Agronomy Department Representative, Manhattan.
  10. Dhungana P., Eskridge K.M., Baenziger P.S., Campbell B.T., Gill K.S., Dweikat I. (2007): Analysis of genotype-by-environment interaction in wheat using a structural equation model and chromosome substitution lines. Crop Science, 47: 477-484. Go to original source...
  11. Dilbirligi M., Erayman M., Campbell B.T., Randhawa H.S., Baenziger P.S., Dweikat I., Gill K.S. (2006): High-density mapping and comparative analysis of agronomically important traits on wheat chromosome 3A. Genomics, 88: 74-87. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Eberhart S.A., Russel L.W.A. (1966): Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6: 36-40. Go to original source...
  13. Haldane J.B.S. (1946): The interaction of nature and nurture. Annals of Eugenics, 13: 197-205. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Jauhar P.P., Xu S.S., Baenziger P.S (2009): Haploidy in cultivated wheats: induction and utility in basic and applied research. Crop Science, 49: 737-755. Go to original source...
  15. Kaeppler S.M. (1997): Quantitative trait locus mapping using sets of near-isogenic lines: relative power comparisons and technical considerations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 95: 384-392. Go to original source...
  16. Kuspria J., Unrau J. (1957): Genetic analyses of certain characters in common wheat using whole chromosome substitution lines. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 37: 300-326. Go to original source...
  17. Law C.N. (1966): The location of genetic factors affecting a quantitative character in wheat. Genetics, 53: 487-498. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Lizarazu R., Mujeeb-Kazi A., William M.D.H.M. (1992): Maize (Zea mays L.): mediated polyhaploid production in some Triticeae using a detached tiller method. Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 46: 335-346.
  19. Mahmood A., Baenziger P.S., Budak H., Gill K.S., Dweikat I. (2004): The use of microsatellite markers for the detection of genetic similarity among winter bread wheat lines for chromosome 3A. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 109: 1494-1503. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Peterson C.J. (1992): Similarities among test sites based on cultivar performance in the hard red winter wheat region. Crop Science, 32: 907-912. Go to original source...
  21. Russell W.K., Eskridge K.M., Travnicek D.A., Guillen-Portal F.R. (2003): Clustering of environments to minimize change in rank of cultivars. Crop Science, 43: 858-864. Go to original source...
  22. Shah M.M., Baenziger P.S., Yen Y., Gill K.S, MorenoSevilla B., Haliloglu K. (1999a): Genetic analysis of agronomic traits controlled by wheat chromosome 3A. Crop Science, 39: 1016-1021. Go to original source...
  23. Shah M.M., Gill K.S., Baenziger P.S., Yen Y., Kaeppler S.M., Ariyarathne H.M. (1999b): Molecular mapping of loci for agronomic traits on chromosome 3A of bread wheat. Crop Science, 39: 1728-1732. Go to original source...
  24. Stroup W.W., Baenziger P.S., Mulitze D.K. (1994): A comparison of methods for removing spatial variation from wheat yield trials. Crop Science, 34: 62-66. Go to original source...
  25. Yen Y., Baenziger P.S. (1992): A better way to construct recombinant chromo­s ome lines and their controls. Genome, 35: 827-830. Go to original source...
  26. Yen Y., Baenz iger P.S., Bruns R., Reeder J., Moreno-Sevilla B., Budak N. (1997): Agronomic performance of hybrids between cultivars and chromosome substitution lines. Crop Science, 37: 396-399. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.