Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 2017, 53(2):76-82 | DOI: 10.17221/28/2016-CJGPB

Response of winter wheat cultivars to crop management and environment in post-registration trialsOriginal Paper

Wies³aw MĦDRY1, Adriana DEREJKO1, Marcin STUDNICKI1*, Jakub PADEREWSKI1, Edward GACEK2
1 Department of Experimental Design and Bioinformatics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
2 Research Centre for Cultivar Testing (COBORU), S³upia Wielka, Poland

In order to deliver essential information related to flexible cultivar recommendations, the cultivars which have been released have to be evaluated under different crop management treatments across agro-ecosystems using two-factorial post-registration multi-environment trials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the yield adaptive patterns of 24 winter wheat cultivars tested across 20 trial locations and three consecutive cropping seasons. The evaluated winter wheat cultivars from many Western European countries and Poland showed different adaptive responses to the Polish agro-ecosystems under each of the crop management intensities. Under the high-input management, the cultivars Rapsodia, (UK) Bogatka and Nadobna (Poland) showed a wide adaptation. The cultivars Alcazar (France), Anthus (Germany), Batuta (Poland) and Boomer (UK) were the best adapted to lower-productive environments and poorly adapted to highly productive conditions under both management treatments.

Keywords: AMMI analysis; ANOVA mixed model; cluster analysis; cultivar adaptations; G × E interactions

Published: June 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
MĦDRY W, DEREJKO A, STUDNICKI M, PADEREWSKI J, GACEK E. Response of winter wheat cultivars to crop management and environment in post-registration trials. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2017;53(2):76-82. doi: 10.17221/28/2016-CJGPB.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Anderson W.K., Van Burgel A.J., Sharma D.L., Shackley B.J., Zaicou-Kunesch C.M., Miyan M.S., Amjad M. (2011): Assessing specific agronomic responses of wheat cultivars in a winter rainfall environment. Crop and Pasture Science, 62: 115-124. Go to original source...
    2. Annicchiarico P. (2002): Genotype-environment Interactions: Challenges and Opportunities for Plant Breeding and Cultivar Recommendations. FAO Paper No. 174, Rome, FAO.
    3. Annicchiarico P., Chiapparino E., Perenzin M. (2010): Response of common wheat varieties to organic and conventional production systems across Italian locations and implications for selection. Field Crops Research, 116: 230-238. Go to original source...
    4. Ebdon J.S., Gauch H.G. (2002): Additive main effect and multiplicative interactions analysis of national turfgrass performance trials. Interpretation of genotype × environment interactions. Crop Science, 42: 489-496. Go to original source...
    5. Gan Y., Malhi S., Brandt F., Katepa-Mupondwa F., Kutcher H. (2007): Brassica juncea Canola in the Northern Great Plains: Responses to diverse environment and nitrogen fertilization. Agronomy Journal, 99: 1208-1218. Go to original source...
    6. Gauch H.G. (2013): A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Science, 53: 1860-1869. Go to original source...
    7. Gauch H.G., Zobel R.W. (1997): Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Science, 37: 311-326. Go to original source...
    8. Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A. (1984): Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed. New York, Wiley & Sons.
    9. Loyce C., Meynard J.M., Bouchard C., Rolland B., Lonnet P., Bataillon P., Bernicot M.H., Bonnefoy M., Charrier X., Debote B., Demarquet T., Duperrier B., Felix I., Heddadj D., Leblanc O., Leleu M., Mangin P., Meausoone M., Doussinault G. (2008): Interaction between cultivar and crop management effects on winter wheat diseases, lodging, and yield. Crop Protection, 27: 1131-1142. Go to original source...
    10. Möhring J., Piepho H.-P. (2009): Comparison of weighting in two-stage analysis of plant breeding trials. Crop Science, 49: 1977-1988. Go to original source...
    11. Przystalski M., Osman A., Thiemt E.M., Rolland B., Ericsson L., Østergård H., Levy L., Wolfe M., Büschse A., Piepho H. P., Krajewski P. (2008): Comparing the performance of cereals varieties in organic and non-organic cropping systems in different European countries. Euphytica, 163: 417-433. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content