Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 2017, 53(3):107-113 | DOI: 10.17221/178/2016-CJGPB

Changes in stem and spike related traits resulting from breeding in Iranian wheat cultivars: associations with grain yieldOriginal Paper

Mehdi JOUDI*,1, Ali AHMADI2, Valiollah MOHAMMADI2
1 Meshkinshahr Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

This study investigated changes in stem and spike characteristics resulting from breeding in Iranian wheat cultivars, and their relationship with grain yield. Eighty-one wheat cultivars released between 1930 and 2006 were examined under well-watered (WW) and terminal drought stress (DS) conditions in Karaj during 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 and under WW condition at Parsabad in Moghan region during 2010-2011. A genetic improvement over time in stem specific weight (SSW) along with significant positive correlations between this trait and grain yield were found at Karaj under DS conditions and at Parsabad, suggesting that SSW could be used as an indirect selection criterion for yield in these environments. Time-dependent changes in spike dry weight showed that the magnitude of partitioned photoassimilates to the spike during the phase anthesis - 16 days after anthesis (16 DAA) was not changed by breeding. However, during the 16 DAA ‒ maturity phase, modern cultivars had more photoassimilates allocated to the spike than the old ones. This suggests that the sink is more limited during early grain growth than during the end of grain filling.

Keywords: partitioned photoassimilates; sink limitation; stem specific weight; Triticum aestivum; Triticum durum

Published: September 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
JOUDI M, AHMADI A, MOHAMMADI V. Changes in stem and spike related traits resulting from breeding in Iranian wheat cultivars: associations with grain yield. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2017;53(3):107-113. doi: 10.17221/178/2016-CJGPB.
Download citation

References

  1. Alvaro F., Isidro J., Villegas D., del Moral L.F.G., Royo C. (2008): Breeding effects on grain filling, biomass partitioning, and remobilization in Mediterranean durum wheat. Agronomy Journal, 100: 361-370. Go to original source...
  2. Blum A. (1998): Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve mobilization. Euphytica, 100: 77-83. Go to original source...
  3. Borras L., Slafer G.A., Otegui M.E. (2004): Seed dry weight response to source-sink manipulation in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Research, 86: 131-146. Go to original source...
  4. Ehdaie B., Alloush G.A., Madore M.A., Waines J.G. (2006): Genotypic variation for stem reserves and mobilization in wheat: I. postanthesis changes in internode dry matter. Crop Science, 46: 735-746. Go to original source...
  5. Ehdaie B., Alloush G.A., Waines J.G. (2008): Genotypic variation in linear rate of grain growth and contribution of stem reserves to grain yield in wheat. Field Crops Research, 106: 34-43. Go to original source...
  6. FAO (2014): FAO Production Statistics. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
  7. Fischer R.A. (2011): Wheat physiology: a review of recent developments. Crop and Pasture Science, 62: 95-114. Go to original source...
  8. Joudi M. (2016): Environmental conditions affect associations between wheat yield and phenological events. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Science, 12: 169-180. Go to original source...
  9. Joudi M., Ahmadi A., Mohamadi V., Abbasi A., Vergauwen R., Mohamadi H., Van den Ende W. (2012): Comparison of fructan dynamics in two wheat cultivars with different capacities of accumulation and remobilization under drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 144: 1-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Joudi M., Ahmadi A., Mohamadi V., Abbasi A., Mohammadi H. (2014): Genetic changes in agronomic and phenologic traits of Iranian wheat cultivars grown in different environmental conditions. Euphytica, 196: 237-249. Go to original source...
  11. Reynolds M.P., Hobbs P.R., Braun H.J. (2007): Challenges to international wheat improvement. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 145: 223-227. Go to original source...
  12. Royo C., Alvaro F., Martos V., Ramdani A., Isidro J., Villegas D., Garcia del Moral L.F. (2007): Genetic changes in durum wheat yield components and associated traits in Italian and Spanish varieties during the 20th century. Euphytica, 155: 259-270. Go to original source...
  13. Saini H.S., Westgate M.E. (2000): Reproductive development in grain crops during drought. Advance in Agronomy, 68: 59-96. Go to original source...
  14. SPSS (1998): SPSS Base 17.0 for Windows user's guide. Chicago, SPSS Inc.
  15. Tambussi E.A., Nogués S., Araus J.L. (2005): Ear of durum wheat under water stress: water relations and photosynthesis metabolism. Planta, 221: 446-458. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Zhang Y., Zhang Y., Wang Z., Wang Z. (2011): Characteristics of canopy structure and contributions of non-leaf organs to yield in winter wheat under different irrigated conditions. Field Crops Research, 123: 187-195. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.