Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 2005, 41(10):39-51 | DOI: 10.17221/6131-CJGPB

Inferring genetic relationship among haplomes in Triticeae: The utility of the 5S DNA units with examples

B.R. Baum

Keywords: cloning; sequence alignment; maximum likelihood; Bayesian analysis; evolutionary inference; unit classes; twat of orthology

Published: December 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Baum BR. Inferring genetic relationship among haplomes in Triticeae: The utility of the 5S DNA units with examples. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2005;41(Special Issue):39-51. doi: 10.17221/6131-CJGPB.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. A S.F., G W., M W., M E.W., L D.J. (1990): Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215: 403-410. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. A R., B B.R. (1992): Evolution of the Nor and 5SDna loci in the Triticeae. In: S P.S., S D.E., D J.J. (eds.): Molecular Systematics of Plants. Chapman & Hall, New York, U.S.A.: 92-116. Go to original source...
    3. A L., B A.-C., L J., S B. (2003): Bioinformatics, 10 (Suppl. 1): i7-i15.
    4. B B.R. (1992): Combining trees as a way of combining datasets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon, 41: 3-10. Go to original source...
    5. B B.R., A R. (1992): Evolutionary change at the 5S DNA loci of species in the Triticeae. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 183: 195-208. Go to original source...
    6. B B.R., B L.G. (1997): The molecular diversity of the 5S rRNA gene in Kengyilia alatavica (Drobov) J.L. Yang, Yen & Baum (Poaceae: Triticeae): potential genomic assignment of different rDNA units. Genome, 40: 215-228. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. B B.R., B L.G. (2000): The 5S rDNA units in Kengyilia (Poaceae: Triticeae): diversity of the non-transcribed spacer and genomic relationships. Canadian Journal of Botany, 78: 1571-1579. Go to original source...
    8. B B.R., B L.G. (2001): The 5S rRNA gene sequence variation in wheats and some polyploid wheat progenitors (Poaceae: Triticeae). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 48: 35-51. Go to original source...
    9. B B.R., J D.A. (1994): The molecular diversity of the 5S rRNA gene in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Genome, 37: 992-998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. B B.R., J D.A. (1996): The 5S rRNA gene units in ancestral two-row barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch) and bulbous barley (H. bulbosum L.): sequence analysis and phylogenetic relationships with the 5S rDNA units in cultivated barley (H. vulgare L.). Genome, 39: 140-149. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. B B.R., J D.A. (1998): The 5S rRNA gene in sea barley (Hordeum marinum Hudson sensu lato): sequence variation among repeat units and relationship to the X haplome in barley (Hordeum). Genome, 41: 652-661. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. B B.R., J D.A. (1999): The 5S rRNA gene in wall barley (Hordeum murinum L. sensu lato): sequence variation among repeat units and relationship to the Y haplome in the genus Hordeum (Poaceae: Triticeae). Genome, 42: 854-866. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. B B.R., J D.A. (2000): The 5S rRNA gene units in the native New World annual Hordeum species (Triticeae: Poaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 78: 1590-1602. Go to original source...
    14. B B.R., J D.A. (2002): A comparison of the 5S rDNA diversity in the Hordeum brachyantherumcalifornicum complex with those of the eastern Asiatic Hordeum roshevitzii and the South American Hordeum cordobense (Triticeae: Poaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 80: 752-762. Go to original source...
    15. B B.R., J D.A. (2003): The South African Hordeum capense is more closely related to some American Hordeum species than to the European Hordeum secalinum: a perspective based on the 5S DNA units (Triticeae: Poaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 81: 1-11. Go to original source...
    16. B B.R., R M.A. (2004): The MRP method. In: B -E O.R.P. (ed.): Phylogenetic Supertrees. Combining information to reveal the tree of life. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: 17-34. Go to original source...
    17. B B.R., B L.G., J D.A., A A.V. (2003): Molecular diversity of the 5S rDNA units in the Elymus dahuricus complex (Poaceae: Triticeae) supports the genomic constitution of St, Y, and H haplomes. Canadian Journal of Botany, 81: 1091-1103. Go to original source...
    18. B B.R., B L.G., B A., R O., N E. (2004): The utility of the nontranscribed spacer of 5S rDNA units grouped into unit classes assigned to haplomes - a test on cultivated wheat and wheat progenitors. Genome, 47: 590-599. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. B B.R., J D.A., B L.G. (2001): Defining groups among multicopy genes prior to inferring phylogeny, with special emphasis on the Triticeae (Poaceae). Hereditas, 135: 123-138. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. B B.R., J D.A., B L.G. (2005): Ancient differentiation of the H and I haplomes in diploid Hordeum species based on 5S rDNA. Genome, 48: 610´618. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. B R., F J., L T. (1986): Meiosis in Interspecific Hordeum hybrids. I. Diploid combinations. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 28: 525-535. Go to original source...
    22. B R., F J., L T. (1987): Meiosis in Interspecific Hordeum hybrids. II. Triploid hybrids. Evolutionary Trends in Plants, 1: 41-50.
    23. B R., J N. (1991): Interspecific hybrids within the genus Hordeum. In: G P.K., T T. (eds.): Chromosome Engineering in Plants: Genetics, Breeding, Evolution, Part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: 411-431. Go to original source...
    24. E J.A. (1998): Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis. Genome Research, 8: 163-167. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. F J. (1985): Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39: 783-791. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. F J. (2004): Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
    27. G N. (1990): Maximum likelihood inference of phylogenetic trees, with special reference to a Poisson process model of DNA substitution and to parsimony analysis. Systematic Zoology, 39: 345-361. Go to original source...
    28. H M., K K., Y T. (1985): Dating the human-ape spli ing by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 22: 160-174. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. H J.P., R F. (2001): MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 17: 754-755. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. K A.G. (1989): A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology, 38: 7-25. Go to original source...
    31. K A.G. (2004): On total evidence: for the record. Cladistics, 20: 205-207. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. O G.J., M H., H R., O R. (1994): FastDNAml: A tool for construction of phylogenetic trees of DNA sequences using maximum likelihood. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 10: 41-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. P G., S O. (2004): On the origin of the tetraploid species Hordeum capense and H. secalinum (Poaceae). Systematic Botany, 29: 862-873. Go to original source...
    34. P D. (2003): Selecting models of evolution. Theory. In: S M.; V A.-M. (eds.): The Phylogenetic Handbook. A practical Approach to DNA and Protein Phylogeny. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
    35. P D., C K.A. (1998): Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14: 817-818. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    36. R M.A. (1992): Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1: 53-58. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    37. S N., N M. (1987): The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4: 406-425. Go to PubMed...
    38. S R.L., C R.C., W J.F. (2004): Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. Australian Journal of Botany, 17: 145-170. Go to original source...
    39. S D.L. (1998): PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. Massachuse s.
    40. T R.L., N D.A., G I.V., T T.A., S U.T., R B.S., K B., G M.Y., F N.D., K E.V. (2001): The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of protein from complete genomes. Nucleic Acid Research, 29: 22-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    41. W S., L, G N. (2001): Molecular phylogenetics: state-of-the-art methods for looking into the past. Trends in Genetics, 17: 262-272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    42. W W. (1996): Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics? Cladistics, 12: 1-9. Go to original source...
    43. W W.C. (1999): Fixed character States and the optimization of molecular sequence data. Cladistics, 15: 379-385. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    44. W W., G D., D L J. (2003): POY version 3.011 available at h p://research.amnh.org/ scicomp/projects/poy.php.
    45. Y Z. (1994): Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 39: 306-314. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    46. Y -P C., V J., M J. (1985): Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequence of M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene, 33: 103-119. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    47. Z C.M., E S.R. (2002): RIO: Analyzing proteomes by automated phylogenomics using resampled inference orthologs. BMC Bioinformatics, 3: 14-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content