Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 2007, 43(4):117-124 | DOI: 10.17221/1901-CJGPB

Multiplicative main cultivar effects in Czech official winter wheat trials 1976-2005

Erik Schwarzbach1, Jiří Hartmann2, Hans-Peter Piepho3
1 Miroslav, Czech Republic
2 Czech Plant Variety Office, Brno, Czech Republic
3 University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Germany

98 winter wheat cultivars, tested by the Czech Plant Variety Office in 554 trials between 1976 and 2005, were analysed for breeding progress, yielding capacity and behaviour in particular environments. The trials were grouped by yield level, years, altitude, precipitation, temperature and ecological regions. Within each group, least squares (LS) adjusted cultivar means and variance components were estimated. The cultivar means within groups were used as primary data for the subsequent analysis across groups. Genetic variance (Vg) increased with increasing yield level while residual variance (Vr) slightly decreased. Although Vg within groups was very different, phenotypic correlations between the cultivar means of the groups were very high. The cultivar yields, plotted against environment yield, followed a funnel-like distribution, expanding from the origin. The data fitted better to the assumption of multiplicative main cultivar effects than to the assumption of additive main cultivar effects, implied by standard models. Standardised relative yields (SRY), assuming multiplicative main cultivar effects on the original scale, were therefore used to analyse the data. The SRY were obtained by standardisation of cultivar means within trial groups to the variance expected from the cultivar means across the trial groups, subtraction of additive environment effects and division by the general mean. The SRY had a smaller relative error, as measured by the Vg/Vr relation, than cultivar means calculated under the assumption of additive main cultivar effects. The SRY were surprisingly consistent over environments. G × E interactions, usually found under the assumption of additive main cultivar effects, may partly be artefacts of the assumption.

Keywords: trial series; cultivars; variance components; adaptation; multiplicative model

Published: December 31, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Schwarzbach E, Hartmann J, Piepho H. Multiplicative main cultivar effects in Czech official winter wheat trials 1976-2005. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2007;43(4):117-124. doi: 10.17221/1901-CJGPB.
Download citation

References

  1. Digby P. (1979): Modified joint regression analysis for incomplete variety × environment data. Journal of Agricultural Science, 93: 81-86. Go to original source...
  2. Finlay K.W., Wilkinson G.N. (1963): The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14: 742-754. Go to original source...
  3. Gauch H.G. (1988): Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics, 44: 705- 715. Go to original source...
  4. Gollob H.F. (1968): A statistical model which combines features of factor analysis and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika, 33: 73-115. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Ng M.P., Grunwald G.K. (1997): Nonlinear regression analysis of the joint-regression model. Biometrics, 53: 1366-1372. Go to original source...
  6. Patterson H.D. (1997): Analysis of series variety trials. In: Kempton R.A., Fox P.N. (eds): Statistical Methods for Plant Variety Evaluation. Chapman & Hall, London. Go to original source...
  7. Piepho H.P. (1997): Analyzing genotype-environment data by mixed models with multiplicative effects. Biometrics, 53: 761-766. Go to original source...
  8. Piepho H.P. (1998a): Empirical best linear unbiased prediction in cultivar trials using factor analytic variance-covariance structures. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 97: 195-201. Go to original source...
  9. Piepho H.P. (1998b): Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems - A review. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 180: 193-213. Go to original source...
  10. Schwarzbach E., Atsmon S.J. (2004): Breeding progress and performance of wheat cultivars in different environments in Israel from 1970 to 2002. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 40: 1-10. Go to original source...
  11. Schwarzbach E., Hartmann J. (2007): Multiplicative cultivar effects in trial series in different environments. In: Hartmann J., Michálek J. (eds): Biometrical Methods and Models in Contemporary Science and Research. ÚKZÚZ, Brno, 351-359.
  12. Schwarzbach E., Hartmann J., Atsmon S. (2007): Advantages and problems of using relative yields as measures of cultivar performance. In: Piepho H.P., Bleiholder H. (eds): Agricultural Field Trials - Today and Tomorrow. Stuttgart, 216-220.
  13. van Eeuwijk F.A., Malosetti M., Yin X., Struik P.C., Stam P. (2004): Modelling differential phenotypic expression. In: 4 th Inter. Crop Science Congr., September 26-October 1, 2004, Brisbane. Available at http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/symposia/3/2/1921_eeuwijk.htm
  14. Wolfinger R. (1996): Heterogeneous variance-covariance structures for repeated measures. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1: 205-230. Go to original source...
  15. Yau S.K., Hamblin J. (1994): Relative yield as a measure of entry performance in variable environments. Crop Science, 34: 813-817. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.