Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 2003, 39(1):15-20 | DOI: 10.17221/3716-CJGPB

Resistance of Maize Inbreds and their Hybrids to Fusarium Stalk Rot

T. Ledečan, D. Šumić, I. Brkić, A. Jambrović, Z. Zdunić
Agricultural Institute Osijek, Department of Maize Breeding and Genetics, Osijek, Croatia

The resistance of 35 inbred lines and their 70 hybrids with two testers to stalk rot is described and the results of natural and artificial stalk infection are compared. A mixture of Fusarium spp. spores was used for artificial infections. The disease was scored for two years. Inbreds and hybrids differed significantly in resistance and infection types in both years. Generally, disease scores of hybrids were lower than of inbreds. No close association was found between lines and their testcross hybrids (r = -0.06 to 0.29) and between hybrids with the two testers (r = -0.04 to 0.38). The correlation coefficients of disease scores after natural and artificial infection were in inbreds and in hybrids highly significant (r = 0.45-0.87). The results suggest, that Fusarium stalk rot resistance should be tested in both inbreds and hybrids. We recommend for maize breeding, that tests with artificial infection should be followed by tests under natural infection.

Keywords: maize; Fusarium stalk rot; inbreds; hybrids; resistance of maize

Published: March 31, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ledečan T, Šumić D, Brkić I, Jambrović A, Zdunić Z. Resistance of Maize Inbreds and their Hybrids to Fusarium Stalk Rot. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2003;39(1):15-20. doi: 10.17221/3716-CJGPB.
Download citation

References

  1. C W.G., C G.M. (1957): Experimental Designs. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  2. D J.L. (1979): Grain sink size and predisposition of Zea mays to stalk rot. Phytopathology, 70: 534-535. Go to original source...
  3. D J.L. (1983): Corn stalk rot: Accounting for annual changes. In: Proc. 38th Annual Corn and Sorghum Res. Conf., 71-79.
  4. H A.R., R W.A., L K.R. (1988): Corn breeding. In: S G.F., D J.W. (eds): Corn and Corn Improvement. 3rd ed. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, 463-564.
  5. H A.L. (1956): Association of resistance to several seedling, root, stalk and ear disease in corn. Phytopathology, 64: 379-384.
  6. H A.L. (1973): New developments in the corn leaf and stalk disease picture. In: Proc. 28th Annu. Corn and Sorghum Res. Conf., 62-71.
  7. H A.L., D M. (1980): Maize stalk rot ratings and predicting hybrid reaction from parental inbred reaction. Genetika, 12: 319-330.
  8. K B. (1960): Corn stalk rots in Illinois. Univ. Illinois, Bull. 658.
  9. N E., C I. (1996): Breeding maize for tolerance to Fusarium stalk and ear rot stress. Romanian Agric. Res., No. 5-6: 43-52.
  10. P B. (1983): Ispitivanje otpornosti kukuruza na trulež stabljike u uslovima prirodne i umjetne infekcije s Gibberella zeae (Schw.) Petch s posebnim osvrtom na lom stabljike. [Master thesis.] Univ. Zagreb, Croatia
  11. P B. (1989): Proučavanje otpornosti samooplodnih linija i hibrida kukuruza prema truleži i lomu stabljike u uvjetima prirodnog i izazvanog stresa. [Dissertation.] Univ. Zagreb, Croatia.
  12. R M., P B., K V. (1990): Testing maize inbred lines and their hybrid combinations (test - crosses) for resistance to stalk rot. In: Proc. II. Nat. Maize Conf., 857-864.
  13. R W.A., (1961): A comparison of five types of testers in evaluating the relationship of stalk rot resistance in corn inbred lines and stalk strength of the lines in hybrid combinations. Crop Sci., 1: 393-397. Go to original source...
  14. S V.M., V B.F., G D.V. (1996): Stem rot infection in inbred maize lines from different heterotic groups and in their hybrids. Visnik Agrarnoi Nauki, No. 5: 20-24.
  15. V A., P D., P B. (1997): Effectiveness of visual selection of maize under conditions of artificial stalk infection. Sjemenarstvo, 14: 163-172.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.